Pavel Kotov vs Frederico Ferreira Silva Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L L W L L W W L L
Form
W W W W W L W W W LHead To Head: Kotov 1 - 1 Silva
They have played 5 sets in total, with Kotov winning 3 and Silva winning 2. The last match between Kotov and Silva was at the Forli 3 Challenger, 22-01-2022, Semifinals, I.hard with Pavel Kotov getting the victory 6-1 6-3.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Pavel Kotov | 1 |
| Frederico Ferreira Silva | 1 |
Forli 3 Challenger(22-01-2022)
6
1
6
3
| Kotov | Stats | Silva |
|---|---|---|
| 37% (7-12) | YTD Win/Loss | 74% (14-5) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 1 |
| 121 | Ranking | 250 |
| 50 | Highest Rank | 168 |
| 26 | Age | 30 |
| R | Plays | L |
| 6 | Titles | 20 |
| 59% (288-199) | Career Total W/L | 62% (505-313) |
| $1,073,890 | Career Prize Money | $131,800 |
| 0 | YTD Titles | 1 |
| 1 | Indoor H2H | 1 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Quinn VS Mensik PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
25 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Krueger VS Potapova PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
22 Apr 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-1 6-3 |
Stats 
Pavel Kotov
Player
Frederico Ferreira Silva
77%
(
30 of
39)
1st Serve %
72%
(
39 of
54)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
87%
(
26 of
30)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
20 of
39)
44%
(
4 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
23%
(
9 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
30 of
54)
60
Total Points Won
33
|
||||
| 6-1 3-6 6-4 |
Stats
Frederico Ferreira Silva
Player
Pavel Kotov
63%
(
49 of
78)
1st Serve %
64%
(
50 of
78)
0
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
5
71%
(
35 of
49)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
33 of
50)
55%
(
16 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
35%
(
27 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
33 of
78)
84
Total Points Won
72
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 1 |
| 3 | Sets Won | 2 |
| 23 | Games Won | 19 |
| 8 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 6 | Total Double Faults | 4 |
| 1:40:33 | Average Match Time | 1:40:33 |
| 68% (80/117) | 1st Serve % | 67% (88/132) |
| 74% (59/80) | 1st Serve Win % | 63% (55/88) |
| 43% (16/37) | 2nd Serve Win % | 45% (20/44) |
| 64% (7/11) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 63% (5/8) |
| 43% (57/132) | Return Points Win % | 36% (42/117) |
| 50% (1/2) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 50% (1/2) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (1/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Pavel Kotov Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Jacob Fearnley
Player
Pavel Kotov
57%
(
47 of
82)
1st Serve %
56%
(
47 of
84)
3
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
1
70%
(
33 of
47)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
35 of
47)
57%
(
20 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
15 of
37)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
35%
(
29 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
34 of
84)
87
Total Points Won
79
|
4-6 6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Norbert Gombos
Player
Pavel Kotov
65%
(
79 of
122)
1st Serve %
69%
(
92 of
133)
5
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
1
70%
(
55 of
79)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
60 of
92)
51%
(
22 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
20 of
41)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
37%
(
45 of
122)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
53 of
133)
130
Total Points Won
125
|
6-7(8) 7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Pavel Kotov
Player
Alejandro Moro Canas
64%
(
67 of
105)
1st Serve %
66%
(
78 of
118)
2
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
4
76%
(
51 of
67)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
46 of
78)
42%
(
16 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
24 of
40)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
36%
(
38 of
105)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
48 of
118)
115
Total Points Won
108
|
6-4 5-7 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Pavel Kotov
Player
Benjamin Hassan
78%
(
52 of
67)
1st Serve %
66%
(
39 of
59)
5
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
3
71%
(
37 of
52)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
26 of
39)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
33%
(
22 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
23 of
59)
68
Total Points Won
58
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mattia Bellucci
Player
Pavel Kotov
57%
(
32 of
56)
1st Serve %
72%
(
46 of
64)
9
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
2
81%
(
26 of
32)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
31 of
46)
63%
(
15 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
27%
(
15 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
26 of
64)
67
Total Points Won
53
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Mackenzie Mcdonald
Player
Pavel Kotov
80%
(
33 of
41)
1st Serve %
66%
(
40 of
61)
1
Aces
7
0
Double Faults
1
88%
(
29 of
33)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
21 of
40)
50%
(
4 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
20%
(
8 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
30 of
61)
63
Total Points Won
39
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Pavel Kotov
Player
Alexis Galarneau
62%
(
44 of
71)
1st Serve %
65%
(
48 of
74)
11
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
75%
(
33 of
44)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
29 of
48)
70%
(
19 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
15 of
26)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
27%
(
19 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
30 of
74)
82
Total Points Won
63
|
4-6 6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Joao Fonseca
Player
Pavel Kotov
67%
(
33 of
49)
1st Serve %
73%
(
53 of
73)
1
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
0
82%
(
27 of
33)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
28 of
53)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
12 of
20)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
12 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
33 of
73)
70
Total Points Won
52
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Colton Smith
Player
Pavel Kotov
77%
(
56 of
73)
1st Serve %
60%
(
49 of
81)
3
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
70%
(
39 of
56)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
34 of
49)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
15 of
32)
20%
(
2 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
32%
(
23 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
32 of
81)
82
Total Points Won
72
|
6-3 7-6(8) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Pavel Kotov
Player
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
67%
(
67 of
100)
1st Serve %
60%
(
58 of
96)
1
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
4
72%
(
48 of
67)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
36 of
58)
52%
(
17 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
23 of
38)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
35%
(
35 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
37 of
96)
102
Total Points Won
94
|
7-6(5) 5-7 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Frederico Ferreira Silva Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SF |
Stats
Marko Topo
Player
Frederico Ferreira Silva
56%
(
32 of
57)
1st Serve %
60%
(
37 of
62)
5
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
0
84%
(
27 of
32)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
25 of
37)
60%
(
15 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
26%
(
15 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
25 of
62)
67
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Frederico Ferreira Silva
Player
Tomas Antonio Serrano Luis
63%
(
30 of
48)
1st Serve %
55%
(
24 of
44)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
0
73%
(
22 of
30)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
35%
(
17 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
26 of
44)
57
Total Points Won
35
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Frederico Ferreira Silva
Player
Sergey Fomin
60%
(
45 of
75)
1st Serve %
60%
(
52 of
87)
3
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
5
73%
(
33 of
45)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
31 of
52)
53%
(
16 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
14 of
35)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
4 of
4)
35%
(
26 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
42 of
87)
91
Total Points Won
71
|
4-6 6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Frederico Ferreira Silva
Player
Nicola Kuhn
60%
(
58 of
96)
1st Serve %
57%
(
59 of
104)
2
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
5
66%
(
38 of
58)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
37 of
59)
47%
(
18 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
17 of
45)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
42%
(
40 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
50 of
104)
106
Total Points Won
94
|
4-6 7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Gastao Elias
Player
Frederico Ferreira Silva
50%
(
59 of
118)
1st Serve %
60%
(
62 of
103)
6
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
4
68%
(
40 of
59)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
34 of
62)
42%
(
25 of
59)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
17 of
41)
53%
(
9 of
17)
Break Points Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
45%
(
53 of
118)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
52 of
103)
117
Total Points Won
104
|
6-7(2) 7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Frederico Ferreira Silva
Player
Diego Dedura-Palomero
60%
(
34 of
57)
1st Serve %
65%
(
36 of
55)
3
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
4
71%
(
24 of
34)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
19 of
36)
61%
(
14 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
33%
(
19 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
28 of
55)
66
Total Points Won
46
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Frederico Ferreira Silva
Player
Millen Hurrion
68%
(
44 of
65)
1st Serve %
46%
(
25 of
54)
1
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
2
66%
(
29 of
44)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
20 of
25)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
11 of
29)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
37%
(
24 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
23 of
54)
64
Total Points Won
55
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Frederico Ferreira Silva
Player
Daniel Batista
67%
(
14 of
21)
1st Serve %
56%
(
10 of
18)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
71%
(
10 of
14)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
57%
(
4 of
7)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
33%
(
7 of
21)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
22
Total Points Won
17
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Frederico Ferreira Silva
Player
Sandro Kopp
62%
(
68 of
109)
1st Serve %
57%
(
61 of
107)
3
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
3
69%
(
47 of
68)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
44 of
61)
61%
(
25 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
26 of
46)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
34%
(
37 of
109)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
37 of
107)
109
Total Points Won
107
|
4-6 6-1 7-6(12) | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Frederico Ferreira Silva
Player
Cezar Cretu
55%
(
48 of
88)
1st Serve %
68%
(
54 of
79)
2
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
6
71%
(
34 of
48)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
33 of
54)
60%
(
24 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
34%
(
30 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
37 of
79)
95
Total Points Won
72
|
6-7(3) 6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 59% (288/199) | Win/Loss | 62% (505/313) |
| 56% (643/510) | Sets Win/Loss | 59% (1110/775) |
| 52% (5789/5362) | Games Win/Loss | 54% (9580/8143) |
| 54% (63/54) | Hard Win/Loss | 68% (262/126) |
| 60% (125/83) | Clay Win/Loss | 56% (194/150) |
| 63% (97/57) | Indoor Hard W/L | 57% (44/33) |
| 38% (3/5) | Grass Win/Loss | 56% (5/4) |
| 0.3 | Aces Per Game | 0.21 |
| 1638 | Aces Total | 1822 |
| 0.21 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.14 |
| 1136 | Total Double Faults | 1221 |
| 1:44:18 | Average Match Time | 1:21:21 |
| 400.72 | Average Opponent Rank | 538.23 |
| 63% (21338/33881) | 1st Serve % | 61% (26193/42699) |
| 69% (14743/21338) | 1st Serve Win % | 68% (17761/26193) |
| 49% (6169/12544) | 2nd Serve Win % | 52% (8547/16506) |
| 41% (1401/3377) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 45% (2081/4668) |
| 40% (13565/34329) | Return Points Win % | 42% (18410/43825) |
| 50% (11/11) | Slam W/L | 52% (14/13) |
| 36% (8/14) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 67% (4/2) |
| 56% (62/49) | Main Tour W/L | 21% (5/19) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 56% (110/87) | Challenger W/L | 51% (169/164) |
| 72% (97/37) | Futures W/L | 73% (313/114) |
| 60% (277/465) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 62% (493/795) |
| 23% (3/13) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 33% (2/6) |
| 54% (97/179) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 52% (127/246) |
| 60% (99/166) | Deciding Set Win % | 59% (153/259) |
| 86% (265/229) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 88% (477/420) |
| 14% (265/36) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 12% (477/57) |
| 26% (222/57) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 25% (341/86) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
